As at February 1999 the proposed development consisted of

This table extracted from information on local developments tells how gross the overdevelopment of peninsula will be.  An additional 20% of the existing Concord population will be squeezed into 4% of the Concord land area.

It is noted that none of the other developments compared have the same problems of

The plan is to put the equivalent of about one half the population of Concord LGA

a) into a former toxic waste dump, 

b) with most open space adjoining the bay with one of the highest counts of 

c) with only two traffic intersections available to take traffic in and out

d) without consideration of the effect of the Shepherd's Bay and Millenium Waters developments on the local traffic and transport which are already inadequate (when analysed on journey times)

e) where the amount of open space per head will be very small, with all the usual implications for disenchanted teenagers and crime figures (See figures above)

f) where the population density will be one of the highest in Sydney, which is completely at odds with the local community and the heritage of the area.

g) where it is proposed to have 6,8 and 10 storey buildings in a suburb where the tallest habitable building in known history is 3 storeys.

h) where the rail line is already acknowledged to be operating at capacity and where owners of land for a proposed duplication have already been notified there land is not required.

i) where the land for the "missing link" between the F4 and the City West link was sold off years ago.

k) where the local primary schools and high schools are already operating at capacity, or will be with the completion of Liberty Grove.

m) where the height of buildings, light of an evening, noise and dust during remediation and construction and noise from the precinct is likely to interfere with the migratory species of birds which use the adjacent wetlands. The nesting of the migratory birds are protected under the JAMBA and CAMBA treaties with other nations. Local residents call on the federal government to honour its obligations under these treaties.

n) where there have been questions asked about the lack of display of an Environmental Impact Study as required by law

o) where there were a number of sinister seeming changes between the exhibited REP and the Gazetted REP including allowing the Minister of DUAP to over ride the RTA who expressed concerns about the traffic impact of the proposed development

p) where the site owners and DUAP continually decline to engage local residents about contamination and remediation.